Last Comments
"Another very strong and powerful post. I’"
pan and tilt units

"good"
alice martin

"How about the attitude of the ROV "
Rein de Vries


Upcoming Events
Seawork International

OCEANS MTS/IEEE

Spacer
Archive
Archive > July/ August 2009, Volume 13, number 6 > Air France Flight AF 447

Air France Flight AF 447

  01/07/2009
A Challenge for Search and Recovery TechnologyAir France flight 447, a scheduled passenger service from Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) to Paris (France), went missing on 1 June 2009 over the Atlantic Ocean with 228 people onboard. The aircraft took off from Galeão International Airport at 22:03 (UTC) on 31 May 2009 with an expected flight time of 11 hours. Contact was lost 4 hours into the flight. No distress calls were made. The recovery of aircraft parts and the ‘black-box’ recorders will be crucial to the investigation team – these tasks will challenge equipment, techniques and the ingenuity of the teams at sea.

Andrew Gerrard, contributing editor, Hydro international

 

Flight Reporting

View Larger Map

The plane followed its routine flight path, tracking the Brazilian coast north-eastwards and turning to cross the Atlantic at waypoint NATAL (see Figure 2).
The last voice report was at 01:33 close to waypoint INTOL (01°21´39"S, 032°49´53"W), 565km off the Brazilian coast: the aircraft was flying normally at 35,000 feet with a speed of 467 knots. The aircraft left Brazilian radar surveillance at 01:48. Messages from the onboard aircraft communications and reporting system (ACARS) maintenance system were received between 02:10 and 02:14 with five FLR (failure) and 19 WRN (warning) reports, indicating that airspeed sensors were giving inconsistent readings, the autopilot and auto-thrust systems had disengaged and the final message was a cabin pressure (vertical speed) warning at 02:14 from location 3°34´40"N 30°22´28"W.

Weather Conditions
A preliminary assessment of the Meteosat imagery from the time of the incident revealed a cluster of severe thunderstorms with hail and air turbulence in the vicinity of the planned aircraft trajectory, although these were not exceptional.

Investigation
The Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety (BEA) will undertake the official investigation. Its role is to determine the circumstances of an event, identify causes and issue safety recommendations – its scope is distinct from any judicial investigation. The recovery of the black-box cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR) will provide crucial information for the BEA investigation team.

Search
A group of Brazilian marines recover debris from the missing Air France jet in the Atlantic Ocean on 8 June 2009 (Courtesy of EPA).At the time of writing, Brazilian military teams have recovered 50 bodies, as well as scattered debris including a section of tailplane (see Figure 1). The scatter of debris extends over a 50-mile area and two distinct clusters have been reported, suggesting the plane may have broken into two in mid-air. French authorities have despatched five ships: IFREMER research vesselPourquoi Pas?; two tugboats,Fairmount GlacierandFairmount Expedition; naval frigateVentôse; and nuclear submarineEmeraude.Ventôsehas assisted with recovery of floating debris and bodies.Emeraudewill conduct an initial search listening for the black-box pinger. Once this has been located,Pourquoi Pas?shall carry out a side-scan sonar survey and there are plans to then deploy a mini-submarine to carry out a detailed photographic survey leading to recovery operations.

The Brazilian sea floor is extremely rugged and around 3,500 metres deep.The accident location is 1,000km from the Brazilian coastline and the sea floor is extremely rugged (making side-scan sonar operations troublesome) and around 3,500 metres deep (making it difficult to detect the black-box pinger with a maximum range of 2–3km). Both operations will require a submersible or deep-tow capability for sensor deployments. Subsequent recovery of substantial aircraft parts will be an almost-impossible task and operations will probably be limited to flight recorder recovery and a detailed sonar and photographic survey.

Despite these problems, there is a precedent for location of sea-floor debris and recovery in these conditions. In 1988, the CVR from South Africa Airways flight 295 was found at a depth of 4,900m in the Indian Ocean. The search phases of this operation were surface search and recovery; underwater pinger beacon search; side-scan sonar and underwater photographic surveys; and recovery. It took two months to locate the aircraft wreckage and more than a year to recover the CVR. The FDR was not found.

Black-box Recorders
The aircraft on flight AF 447 was F-GCZP, an Airbus A330-203, which came into service in April 2005. Detailed reconstruction of events leading to the accident relies on the information recorded by the black boxes. Two black-box recorders are located in the after section of the fuselage (the most crash-survivable part of the aircraft). The FDR monitors altitude, airspeed and heading, and some units record up to 1,000 separate parameters. The CVR records radio transmissions and voice and engine noise in the cockpit. Each recorder is fitted with an underwater locator beacon (ULB). The ULB pinger has an acoustic frequency of 37.5kHz, transmitting initially with 1,060 dynes/cm2, and has a battery life of at least 30 days. Maximum detection range is 2–3km.


The Challenges
The most urgent task after recovery of floating debris is to locate the black-box pinger. Once this location is known, a more systematic programme of operations can be planned and this can be undertaken in discrete phases, allowing a thorough analysis of the results of each stage.

A multi-beam echosounder (MBES) bathymetry survey will provide a good general idea of sea-floor depths and topography, although given the resolution of surface-deployed MBES it is unlikely to positively detect aircraft debris. A deep-towed side-scan sonar survey should enable the compilation of more detailed sea-floor imagery and identify larger sections of aircraft wreckage.
Further survey operations could be planned from an AUV or submersible to get the highest resolution dimensional measurements and acoustic imagery. This might be followed by a photographic mission to discover more about the condition of the aircraft.

Interventions to recover the black-box recorders and then to consider other significant items of debris will be major operations, involving manyvessels and large teams over an extended period.





     


Comments (13):

BEA, the French Civil Aviation Safety Investigation Authority, published last week the final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro - Paris: www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol.af.447/rapport.final.fr.php
Some recommandations to ICAO are related to the search of the human bodies and the aircraft flight recorders in maritime areas. One is to drop satellite-tracked buoys from the first search aircraft over the area to measure the drift. Onather one is to increase the transmission time and range of the beacons of the flight recorders.
The report notices that given the distance from the accident and the topography
of the sea bed, the search operrations required the considerable mobilisation of air,
naval and underwater forces and, even more so, of multidisciplinary skills (safety
investigators, scientists, the army, underwater search experts, etc). It mentions that the
bathymetric survey of the 40 NM circle carried out during the 2 first phases on board the research vessel Pourquoi Pas? enabled BEA to ensure the subsequent safe and efficient deployment of the autonomous and towed resources.
Pierre-Yves Dupuy - 08/07/2012 - 22:57


When the American Airlines plane crahsed on Takeoff out of JFK in 2001, the composite tail snapped off from stress. What is the chance the computer readings casued a similar forced stress on this tail section and it actually fell off miles from where the rest of the plane went down? This could account for the why the plane is not found near where the tail was found floating. Dave Martin - 12/10/2009 - 18:14


Let me add some information to this article.
The BEA is supported by institutes in marine and atmospheric environment including the French Navy Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service (SHOM).
Existing environment information were key in the initial decisions (meteoroly, oceanography, hydrography). The priority was the recovery of human bodies. The search of the bodies and the debris was a challenging task: the location of the accident is not precisely known and as a result the area to explore is very large.
The recovery of the black boxes is indeed also very challenging for the same reason and even with the use of advanced models (French, Brasilian and American) it has not been possible to precisely calculate the drifts of the bodies and the debris and therefore to locate the point of accident. The sea bed is also bumpy and poorly known.
Locating the boxes thanks to the acoustic signals from the pingers unfortunately failed as everyone knows (pingers do no longer emit since mid-July). Currently, Pourquoi pas? is conducting side scan sonar surveys and explorations with a AUV or a submarine with preliminary bathymetric surveys. The process is very slow and fastidious.
Pourquoi Pas? is a brand-new research vessel funded by both French Ministry of Research and French Ministry of Defense for military and civilian campaigns. Since the deployment decided by the French Government for the AF 447 search operations, there are SHOM hydrographic surveyors on board.
Pierre-Yves Dupuy (www.shom.fr) - 13/08/2009 - 15:27


how many bodies recovered from doomed air-france? james - 11/08/2009 - 09:21


Sea surface currents close to the search area were logged in a hydro survey for a Brazil-Canary Islands telephone system.
See http://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/1973Bracan/BracanAtt3.htm
This link has been passed to the UK's AAIB who are assisting the French BEA.
John Holmes - 25/07/2009 - 14:55


This tragic incident has poise a lot of challenges and realities to our level of concern and researches into the ocean bodies. We must not failed as a community in identifying the possible causes and locations of virtually all sensors on board. This also called to mind the needs for more innovative studies in the realm of the oceans. Man has been exploring greater distances to the orbits, then why not to the ocean depths? Hamid-Mosaku, A.I. - 09/07/2009 - 21:12


Though geophysical surveys coudl help a lot. Its efficacay is doubtuful considering the depth of the accident site.

Deep Flight Submersible Survey seems to be an alternative. I am not sure of their effica
Bharat Kumar - 03/07/2009 - 12:22


Again the very critical role of hydrographic surveying has been accentuated by this incident and the recovery efforts. I pray that the efforts of these SSS and Photographic surveys yield fruitful finds. Cdr Ayo Olugbode - 03/07/2009 - 05:06


A good article with technical detail. Information about sonar and side-scan sonar is presented in the short course
Sonar Signal Processing July 14-16, 2009 in Beltsville, MD
http://www.aticourses.com/sonar_signal_processing.htm
Jim Jenkins ATIcourses - 02/07/2009 - 18:29


what a great information, I still believe, detailed sonar and photographic survey done this might lead to recovery of the black box. abiodun awofeko - 02/07/2009 - 15:07


Very interesting article indeed, it is maybe not known to everybody that several ocean forecasting centers are carrying out routine analyses of 3D ocean currents. Would these data be useful in finding the black box? Best of luck! Laurent Bertino - 02/07/2009 - 13:29


Illuminating article providing good additional data compared to general media coverage. Those Black Box beacon transmissions are right on the edge of the time limit now. Roger Scrivens RS Aqua Ltd - 02/07/2009 - 13:13


A very timely and interesting article. Modern recovery techniques will be severely challenged I am afraid. I wish these experts good fortune. The reasons for this disaster must be found. Barry Lusk - 01/07/2009 - 16:35


Make your comment:
Name:
Your comment:
Type over the 2 words (or number) from the picture
 
Top Articles Top News Top Jobs
Spacer
 

Interactive

Demo of RIEGL Airborne Bathy Scanner in Camcopter UAV

It's not an AUV but an UAV. So an unmanned vehicle, but in the air instead of underwater. This movie shows a demonstration of the bathymetric laser scanning capabilities of the RIEGL VQ-820-GU hydrographic airborne sensor in reality. For more information on the technical side, please see the news release on Hydro International.

 

 Last 5 items:
 Demo of RIEGL Airborne Bathy Scanner in Camcopter UAV
 Mareano Reveals Secrets of the Seabed
 Pourquoi Pas? Leaves Piraeus
 
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer