Spacer
Archive
Archive > May 2005, Volume 9, Number 4 > The Eastern Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami

The Eastern Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami

  01/01/1970
First seafloor survey by Royal Navy’s HMS Scott
The earthquake offshore Sumatra, Indonesia and the Nicobar-Andaman Islands, India on 26th December 2004 (Figure 1) was the second largest earthquake ever recorded (in 50-60 years recording history) with a moment magnitude of 9.3. The resulting tsunami wave propagated across the Indian Ocean causing devastation in coastal south-east Asia, Sri Lanka, India and East Africa and the loss of an estimated 300,000 lives. First post-disaster seafloor survey of the area was recently completed.
Lisa McNeill and Tim Henstock, SOC, and Dave Tappin, British Geological Survey, UK

The earthquake resulted from a tectonic-plate process known as subduction. A subduction zone occurs where two tectonic plates advance towards one another, resulting in one sliding beneath the other. In this case, the oceanic Indian plate is moving towards and subducting beneath the continental Eurasian plate (Figure 2). As the two plates converge, strain builds up on the fault between the two plates (plate boundary) and is periodically released as earthquakes. Because these earthquakes occur beneath the sea, the seafloor movement they generate can often produce a tsunami. Subduction zones produce the largest earthquakes in the world due to the large potential fault area (see below). The collision process produces forces of compression that in turn produce folded ridges and compression-fault motion. As the plates collide sediments are scraped off one plate and transferred to the other. These folded and faulted sediments form the accretionary wedge (Figure 2), the region where most recent deformation caused by plate collision occurs.

Surveying the Consequences
The 2004 earthquake was initiated offshore Sumatra at a depth of ~30-40km below the seafloor, on the plate boundary fault (Figure 2). It then propagated along the fault zone, mostly to the north along the subduction zone and to the west to the position where the fault between the plates comes closest to the seafloor (plate boundary or deformation front, Figure 2). The earthquake ruptured a total fault length of about 1,200km, extending from offshore Sumatra to the Andaman Islands and with a rupture width of ~ 150km. Maximum slip on the fault was 10-20m. It is the rupture area and fault-slip that together dictate the magnitude of the earthquake. The slip on the fault caused the entire overlying seafloor to move and initiated the tsunami wave, although the exact nature of this movement is complex and currently poorly understood.
The Royal Navy’s HMS Scott, a hydrographic survey vessel, conducted the first seafloor survey of the southern and initial area of the earthquake rupture zone. The expedition represented the first time the HMS Scott had worked with scientists on a research project. Multi-beam bathymetric data of the seafloor was collected using 12kHz, 361 beam hull-mounted Sass IV sonar. An area of ~40,000 square km of seafloor was surveyed during the three-week expedition. The region lacks any publicly available multi-beam data from before the earthquake and very little recent geophysical data in general.

Revealing Results
Initial results reveal the geomorphology of the seafloor and clues to the tectonic and sedimentary processes controlling this morphology. The morphology revealed has been created over thousands and millions of years as the two plates have converged. The gradient of the seafloor from the plate boundary (deformation front) where the two plates collide, across the accretionary-wedge folds is very steep, rising ~4,000m over a distance of about 20km in places. These steep slopes and continuing uplift due to collision, augmented by earthquake shaking, leads to extensive slope failure and submarine landslide. The seafloor of the accretionary-wedge folded ridges is therefore heavily eroded in places (see Figures 3 and 4). At the deformation front, coherent landslides produce angular blocks that have slid onto the non-deformed Indian plate. The youngest of these features has angular coherent blocks and a steep landslide headwall scarp, and may be recent. Sediment from these landslides and slumps is transported into neighbouring basins by short canyon and channel systems. No evidence was found of recent landslides large enough to contribute significantly to the tsunami generated in 2004.
The individual fold ridges of the accretionary wedge can be identified in the multi-beam images. The youngest of these fold ridges at the deformation front where the plates meet are relatively uneroded and only a few hundred metres high (Figure 3); they will have formed over thousands of years. The quality of the data allows us to
investigate a range of more subtle features, some perhaps formed by tectonic movement during large earthquakes. Some show a detailed history of erosion over long and short periods of time and some will help in more general studies of the physical and chemical changes that occur within accretionary wedge sediments.
Post-expeditionary analysis and interpretation of the data continues and initial results will be presented at forthcoming international scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. The data and results will also be used to plan the next phase of study, including higher resolution study of selected targets, some of which may have formed during the 2004 earthquake. Geophysical data imaging of the sub-surface will also be essential to gain an understanding of the structure of the subduction system, the nature of the plate boundary fault which generated the fault system and how slip was transferred from this major fault to the seafloor. These results will give scientists better insight into how the earthquake was generated, what controlled its magnitude and how these factors contributed to the initiation of the tsunami. This information will be used to assess future earthquake and tsunami hazards in the Indian Ocean and other subduction zones around the world.

Acknowledgements
Data gathered by UK Royal Navy Survey Vessel HMS Scott, during Marine Scientific Research co-ordinated by the Joint Environment directorate of Defence Intelligence. The Royal Navy, British Geological Survey, Southampton Oceanography Centre, the United Kingdom Hydrographic Office and the Government of Indonesia co-operated on this project.

Biography of the author
Lisa McNeill is a lecturer at Southampton Oceanography Centre in the UK. She is a geologist researching active tectonic processes, with expertise in convergent margins (subduction zones), continental rift zones and strike-slip fault systems. Ms McNeill uses both marine geophysical techniques offshore and field-based techniques onshore to investigate active faults. Over the past ten years she has worked on the Cascadia (USA) and Nankai (Japan) subduction zone margins, analogous to the Indonesian margin. Tim Henstock is a senior lecturer at the Southampton Oceanography Centre. He is a geophysicist who works broadly to apply physics-based methods to the study of the Earth. He has more than ten years experience working on large-scale active tectonic systems such as the San Andreas Fault and the Cascadia subduction zone. More recently he has, in conjunction with Lisa McNeill and others, been investigating neotectonics in Greece using high-resolution swath bathymetry and seismic data. Dave Tappin is a marine geologist with the British Geological Survey, based in Nottingham, England. He has over thirty years experience working in the UK, and twenty years spent on overseas projects, mainly in the Pacific and Indian oceans. For the past seven years he has been studying tsunamis generated by submarine landslides and was co-chief scientist on four major marine surveys studying the Papua New Guinea event of 1998, when 2,000 people died. Most recently he has been studying the Giant Submarine Landslides of Hawaii that have the potential to generate tsunamis of hundreds of metres. Dave Tappin publishes by permission of the director of the British Geological Survey.




     


Comments (0):
There are no comments yet.
Make your comment:
Name:
Your comment:
Type over the 2 words (or number) from the picture
 
Most Popular Articles Most Popular News Most Popular Jobs
Spacer
 

Interactive


Hydrographic Survey of Riverbed Erosion

Members of the US Geological Survey were filmed while out on the Missouri River at Williston, North Dakota, USA, performing a hydrographic survey to monitor the state of riverbed erosion. They were using a multibeam echo sounder which transmits sound energy and analyses the return signal (echo) that has bounced off the riverbed or other objects. Multibeam sonars emit sound waves from directly beneath a ship's hull to produce fan-shaped coverage of the riverbed. 


Gauge height at the Williston gauge was approximately 27.65 feet when this video was taken. Additional information about the USGS streamgauge at Williston is available at http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nd/nwis?program=nwisman&site_no=06330000

 

 Last 5 items:
 Hydrographic Survey of Riverbed Erosion
 Introduction to GEBCO
 MCA on Surveying the British Coast
 Surveying in the Port of London
 Venessa O'Connell on Hydrography
 
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Poll

What is More Interesting for Hydrographic Surveyors?


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer