Spacer

Poll

Chart Licencing Should





     


Comments (8):

Eventhough the data collected towards preparing a chart can be outsourced, it seems that the chart production is confined to the hydrographic departments... if the data can be used why not let others prepare and scrutinised by the Hydro departments Sanyal Sunil - 08/12/2009 - 12:56


it appears that the admiralty have already decided what is appropriate licensing for charts - no matter what the industry means and it appears to only increase their profits.

http://www.shareholderexecutive.gov.uk/performance/ukho.asp

JS
john stone - 30/07/2009 - 15:23


Since I started receiving Hydro International I have enjoyed reading and it has expanded my knowledge on marine science. Bowers Owino - 27/07/2009 - 06:46


There is some hope for those getting frustrated by the complexities of ENC licencing. With ENCTrack the mariner can access all ENCs, but is only charged for those he navigates on, based on the track of the vessel. More info at http://www.enctrack.com Willem Amels - 25/06/2009 - 20:38


Harmonization and standardization of all nautical chart information that is to be used for commercial navigation is a must. If the data that you have gathered is not quality assured then it should not be allowed to be used for the production of nautical charts that will be used for navigation.
IHB should be the world wide licensing authority and financially supported in this endeavor by all member states.
Barry M. Lusk - 09/06/2009 - 18:28


The present licensing does not take into account the sometimes very brief time ENCs are used. This applies both for the parts of the commercial shipping and for recreational users. Also the (implementation in applications) of the system generally seems way more complicated than needed to protect the different interests. Peter Kluytenaar - 04/06/2009 - 19:52


Definately time to clear this up. It is confusing and becoming hard for me and my crew to understand what we are paying for. Guy Rogers - 04/06/2009 - 13:44


In a ENC world where each Hydrographic office sets its own licensing conditions - both in terms of pricing and use of data (3,6 and 12) - its just amazing that a standard has emerged!

The overall objective should be to completely harmonise licensing periods within the IHO structure (so called WEND)

John
John Stone - 04/06/2009 - 13:26


Make your comment:
Name:
Your comment:
Type over the 2 words (or number) from the picture
 

Most Popular Articles Most Popular News Most Popular Jobs
Spacer
 

Interactive


Hydrographic Survey of Riverbed Erosion

Members of the US Geological Survey were filmed while out on the Missouri River at Williston, North Dakota, USA, performing a hydrographic survey to monitor the state of riverbed erosion. They were using a multibeam echo sounder which transmits sound energy and analyses the return signal (echo) that has bounced off the riverbed or other objects. Multibeam sonars emit sound waves from directly beneath a ship's hull to produce fan-shaped coverage of the riverbed. 


Gauge height at the Williston gauge was approximately 27.65 feet when this video was taken. Additional information about the USGS streamgauge at Williston is available at http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nd/nwis?program=nwisman&site_no=06330000

 

 Last 5 items:
 Hydrographic Survey of Riverbed Erosion
 Introduction to GEBCO
 MCA on Surveying the British Coast
 Surveying in the Port of London
 Venessa O'Connell on Hydrography
 
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Poll

Chart Licencing Should


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer
Spacer